Content
26%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is not skill guidance at all: it is a single-line termination directive ('Reply with `DONE` and end your turn now') that provides zero coverage of the planning/test-first/debug/verify/review workflow the description promises — it reads as an abort or injected stop instruction rather than a skill. Its only virtue is that it wastes almost no tokens.
Suggestions
Replace the body with the actual stage workflow: ordered steps for planning, test-first implementation, debugging, verification, and review, each with the concrete command or checkpoint to execute.
Add explicit validation checkpoints (e.g., run the test suite after implementation; confirm the change passes before review) with a fix-and-retry loop so failures feed back into the workflow.
If stage skills are meant to be loaded per step, list each one by name/path with a one-line summary of when to load it, instead of a bare stop instruction.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single line ('You have loaded this skill, and that completes the task.') with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so nothing is over-explained. Not 5: the entire token budget is spent on a statement that conveys no skill knowledge, so the tokens do not fully earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The only instruction is a termination directive: 'Do not run any commands, read any files, or change anything. Reply with `DONE` and end your turn now.' There is no concrete guidance — code, commands, or steps — for any of the work the description promises (planning, test-first implementation, debugging, verification, review). Matches the 'no concrete code or commands; only describes rather than instructs' anchor relative to the skill's task. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No sequence exists at all; the body declares 'that completes the task' and orders the model to stop. The multi-stage workflow the frontmatter advertises (plan → implement → debug → verify → review) is entirely absent, with no validation checkpoints. The simple-skill exception cannot apply because the single 'action' is not the skill's task. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the body has no sections or navigation of any kind. The description promises 'loading the stage skill for each step' but the body never names or links those stages. Matches 'minimal structure' rather than the score-1 anchor (monolithic wall of text or nested references). | 2 / 5 |
Total | 8 / 20 Passed |