Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise overview that correctly delegates implementation depth to a single clearly signaled reference. Its main weakness is actionability and workflow clarity: the overview names tools but shows no executable example and lacks an explicit test-then-verify sequence.
Suggestions
Add one small copy-paste-ready code snippet (e.g. a jest-axe expect or a Playwright axe scan) so the overview is executable, not just directional.
Turn Check/Fix/Explain into a short ordered workflow with a validation step (run tests in CI, confirm they fail on a known violation, then pass after fix).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with concrete tool names in the Quick Reference and terse section bodies; the only padding is the motivational opener ('catches 30-50% of WCAG violations... reducing legal risk') which could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names specific tools (jest-axe, @axe-core/playwright, cypress-axe, color-contrast) but provides no executable code or commands in the body, delegating all implementation to references/rule.md, leaving the overview itself with incomplete concrete guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections give a loose framing but no sequenced workflow, and there are no validation checkpoints for verifying that added tests actually pass or catch regressions. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clean overview body with well-organized sections and a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md') for full implementation details; navigation is easy and nothing is buried. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |