Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured simple review skill with clean progressive disclosure to one real reference. It is held back by guidance that describes what to check without a concrete method to find duplicates and by the absence of an explicit verification step in the body.
Suggestions
Add a concrete detection method, e.g. `document.querySelectorAll('[accesskey]')` and a note to compare attribute values, so the Check step is executable rather than descriptive.
Insert an explicit verification checkpoint in the body (e.g. re-run the duplicate scan and confirm with keyboard-only navigation) rather than leaving it implied by the Code Review section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with short Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, and Code Review sections and no padding with concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is instruction-only and reasonably specific ("Check for duplicate `accesskey` attributes across the document", "Assign unique values… or remove redundant ones") but omits the how — no selector, command, or method to actually locate duplicates, so key details are missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A Check→Fix→Explain→Code Review sequence is present, but the body has no explicit validation/verification checkpoint even though the Code Review section implies verifying the fix; checkpoints are implicit rather than stated. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single one-level-deep reference (`references/rule.md`, verified to exist) is clearly signaled at the end, and the body is well-organized into short sections — appropriate for a sub-50-line simple skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |