Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, brief skill body that appropriately offloads detail to one referenced file. Its main weakness is actionability: the inline guidance describes what to check but stops short of giving an executable method or selector for finding duplicate accesskeys.
Suggestions
Add an executable check to the 'Check' section, e.g. a grep/selector for duplicate accesskey values (e.g. `grep -rhoi 'accesskey="\(.\)"' | sort | uniq -d`) so Claude can run it directly.
Make the 'Fix' step prescriptive with a concrete example (assign a unique unused value, or remove the redundant attribute) rather than the generic 'assign unique values or remove redundant ones'.
Tighten the 'Explain' section to a one-liner or fold it into Quick Reference to remove restatement of obvious accessibility rationale.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and sectioned with minimal padding; a few lines (the 'Explain' section and Quick Reference bullet on keyboard users) restate obvious context, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete in direction ('Check for duplicate accesskey attributes across the document') but lacks executable commands or a specific verification query, and the 'Fix' step is generic rather than prescriptive. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sequence gives a clear flow for this simple review skill; no explicit validation checkpoint is stated in the body itself, but the rule is non-destructive so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer to references/rule.md, matching the ideal structure for a simple skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |