CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

affiliate-disclosure

Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Provide clear affiliate disclosures. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.

48

Quality

52%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/affiliate-disclosure/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

46%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a clean, well-structured overview that correctly offloads detail to a real one-level reference, but it leans on generic SEO knowledge instead of concrete, executable audit steps and lacks explicit validation checkpoints within the body itself.

Suggestions

Add at least one concrete, executable check in the body (e.g. a CSS selector or grep pattern to find affiliate/sponsored links, or a curl/header command to inspect rendered output) so the guidance is copy-paste ready.

Insert an explicit validation step into the Check/Fix workflow (e.g. 'After adding the disclosure, re-fetch the rendered HTML and confirm the disclosure precedes the first affiliate link').

Trim the general-knowledge framing ('required by law (e.g., FTC guidelines)', E-E-A-T trust pillar) that Claude already knows and replace it with rule-specific verification detail.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is short and sectioned, but much of it restates generic knowledge Claude already has (e.g. that disclosures are required by law, FTC guidelines, E-E-A-T trust) without adding skill-specific operational detail, so it is mostly efficient but padded in places.

3 / 5

Actionability

The body offers only high-level directives ('Add a standardized disclosure statement', 'Review metadata generation, rendered HTML') with no concrete selectors, commands, or executable checks; the only concrete artifact (an HTML disclosure snippet) lives in the reference file rather than the body.

2 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A rough Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sequence is present, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops in the body itself; the reference file does add a verification section, lifting it only slightly above a bare sequence.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clear overview that points to a single real one-level-deep reference (references/rule.md) for implementation details, and that file exists and is well-organized, satisfying good structure with only minor gaps.

4 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Description

58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description has an explicit 'Use when' trigger and names a coherent SEO-audit domain with a verification directive, but suffers from a broken template artifact ('related to Provide clear affiliate disclosures') that disrupts grammar and weakens natural trigger phrasing.

Suggestions

Rewrite the broken clause so the description reads as a grammatical sentence, e.g. 'Use when auditing affiliate or sponsored link disclosures for legal compliance and SEO transparency.'

Lead with the concrete 'what' (e.g. 'Audits pages for clear, conspicuous affiliate disclosures') before the 'Use when' trigger to satisfy both completeness anchors at score 5.

Tighten distinctiveness by foregrounding the affiliate-disclosure niche over generic 'metadata, crawlability, structured data' language that overlaps with broader SEO skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the SEO auditing domain and concrete actions ('auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability' plus 'Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response'), but the actions are generic audit verbs rather than a comprehensive set of specific operations.

3 / 5

Completeness

It opens with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and states what to do (audit metadata/crawlability/structured data and verify rendered HTML/HTTP response), covering both 'when' and 'what', though the 'what' is somewhat broad.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some natural terms a user might say ('affiliate disclosures', 'structured data', 'crawlability') but is missing common synonyms and the phrasing is disrupted by the broken 'Provide clear affiliate disclosures' clause, reducing natural keyword quality.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The affiliate-disclosure niche is fairly specific, but the broad auditing language ('metadata, crawlability, structured data, indexability') overlaps with many other SEO skills, creating moderate conflict risk.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.