Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview with strong progressive disclosure and actionable good/bad examples, but it carries redundant background explanation and lacks explicit verification checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Remove or trim the '2.2 billion people' stat and the WCAG explanation in the body since they are repeated in the 'Explain' section and the reference; Claude already knows this context.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint step (e.g., run axe/WAVE or confirm in DevTools) to the body's Check/Fix sequence rather than only in the reference.
Consolidate the overlapping decorative/informative/linked-image guidance so each point appears once across Quick Reference, Check, and Fix instead of being restated in Explain.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but includes background Claude already knows (the '2.2 billion people' stat, repeated WCAG/screen-reader explanations) and restates decorative/informative/linked-image guidance across Quick Reference, Check, Fix, and Explain. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific guidance with good/bad alt examples ('Bar chart showing 40% increase in sales Q3 2024' vs alt='chart') and explicit flagging criteria; minor gaps only. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Check→Fix→Explain→Code Review gives a recognizable sequence, but validation/verification checkpoints are implicit and relegated to the reference rather than stated as explicit steps in the body. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview body with a clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer ('see references/rule.md') that resolves to a real file; content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |