CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

anchor-text

Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Use descriptive anchor text. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.

60

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/anchor-text/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, appropriately brief overview that correctly pushes detail to a real, clearly referenced bundle file. Its weakness is actionability — the Check section says what to verify but not how to detect generic anchors concretely — plus minor redundancy between the Check and Code Review sections.

Suggestions

Make the Check section concrete: give a detection method such as a grep/selector for generic anchors ('click here', 'read more', 'learn more', 'here') against the rendered HTML, or name the tooling to enumerate links.

Merge or differentiate the Check and Code Review sections, which currently repeat the same verification instruction, to remove redundancy.

Trim the intro sentence and Explain section that restate well-known anchor-text SEO/accessibility rationale, or move the rationale to references/rule.md where it already exists.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

A lean ~30-line body with clear one-line sections; the intro sentence and "Explain" section restate anchor-text SEO/accessibility concepts Claude already knows and could be trimmed, matching the minor-instances-of-over-explanation anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Some concrete guidance ("Replace generic link text like 'click here' with descriptive phrases", "Flag exact routes or templates") but the Check section gives no detection method — no command, selector, or procedure for enumerating links in rendered HTML — leaving key execution details missing.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sections form a clear sequence with verification guidance ("describe how to verify the final page output"). Not 5: Check and Code Review overlap redundantly and checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise, well-organized overview that cleanly delegates implementation details, code examples, and verification to a single well-signaled one-level-deep reference ("see references/rule.md"), which exists and contains exactly that material.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when with a usable explicit trigger and mostly concrete language. Its main flaws are the garbled embedded rule name ("related to Use descriptive anchor text") and reliance on broad SEO terms that overlap heavily with sibling rules in the same family.

Suggestions

Rewrite the rule-name embedding as a proper clause, e.g. "Audits links for descriptive anchor text... Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability on a site."

Add distinguishing trigger terms such as "link text", "internal links", and "SEO" so this rule is selected over sibling metadata/crawlability rules.

State the core capability first (what the skill checks) before the "Use when" clause, instead of leading with the trigger.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete audit targets ("auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability") plus a concrete verification action ("Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response"), matching the several-specific-actions anchor; not a 5 because the core action is muddled by the awkwardly embedded rule name "related to Use descriptive anchor text".

4 / 5

Completeness

Both what (audit the rule and verify rendered HTML/HTTP output) and an explicit when ("Use when auditing metadata, crawlability...") are present. Not 5 because the 'what' is tangled — "related to Use descriptive anchor text" reads as a template-substitution artifact rather than a crisp capability statement.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural-term coverage: metadata, crawlability, structured data, anchor text, rendered HTML, HTTP response — phrasing an SEO auditor would use. Not 5 because common synonyms like "links", "link text", "internal links", or "SEO" are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability" are broad SEO terms shared by many sibling checklist-rule skills, so overlap risk with similar skills is real; only the "descriptive anchor text" mention distinguishes it.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

Path

skills/anchor-text/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.