Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean overview that delegates detail to a verified one-level reference and gives concrete actionable guidance. The only weakness is a mildly redundant "Explain" section that overlaps the opening justification.
Suggestions
Remove or merge the "Explain" section, since its content restates the ghost-focus rationale already given in the opening sentence, saving tokens without losing information.
Consider adding one short inline HTML snippet showing the incorrect vs. correct (tabindex="-1" / inert) markup so the "Fix" is copy-paste ready without requiring a jump to the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but the "Explain" section ("Explain why focusable elements inside aria-hidden containers cause confusion...") is a meta-instruction that overlaps with the opening justification sentence and could be tightened or removed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance with exact attribute values ("tabindex=\"-1\"" or "inert") and specific elements to scan (links, buttons, inputs); as an instruction-only skill the absence of inline code is not penalized because the guidance is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check → Fix → Code Review sequence is present, with an explicit verification note ("verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech"); for a simple single-purpose review skill this is unambiguous. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that cleanly signals a single one-level-deep reference ("see references/rule.md"), which exists and holds the detailed implementation and code examples. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |