Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized review skill body that defers detail appropriately to a real one-level reference and gives concrete attribute-level guidance. Minor redundancy and the lack of inline code examples keep it just short of top marks on conciseness and actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with only minor redundancy (the Quick Reference bullets restate the Check and Fix sections) and one brief motivational sentence; not a 5 because that redundancy could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance ('Add tabindex="-1"…or use the inert attribute', 'Flag exact elements, roles, labels, focus behavior') with specific attribute names; not a 5 because inline code examples are deferred to the reference rather than shown for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is present and unambiguous; not a 5 because there are no explicit validation/feedback checkpoints, though this non-destructive review skill does not strictly require them. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep navigation to references/rule.md ('see references/rule.md' for full details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance), and that reference file exists and is substantive. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |