The body is mostly lean and well-sectioned, but it explains a concept Claude already knows ("A meter represents a scalar measurement; without a label, a user might hear a value...") and includes a generic "Explain why measurements need context..." section. It is not a 3 because those passages do not earn their tokens, and not a 1 because the bulk is efficient and direct.

It gives concrete attributes to check and apply ("aria-label or aria-labelledby", "role=\"meter\"") but provides no in-body executable example — code is deferred to references/rule.md. It is not a 3 because the body itself lacks copy-paste-ready examples or selectors, and not a 1 because the named attributes and elements are specific and actionable.

The Check / Fix / Explain / Code Review structure gives a clear sequence for a simple review task, but verification is described ("note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech") rather than given as an explicit in-body checkpoint. It is not a 3 because the validation step is implicit in the body, and not a 1 because the sequence is present and unambiguous.

The body is a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep navigation to references/rule.md ("For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md"), and that file exists and is not further nested. It is not a 2 because the split is appropriate and the reference is explicitly signaled.

The description lists multiple concrete actions — "Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output" — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor. It is not a 2 because the actions are concrete and enumerated rather than a single domain statement.

It answers both "what" (check native semantics, inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, screen-reader output) and "when" with an explicit "Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns..." trigger. It is not a 2 because the when-clause is explicit, not merely implied.

It includes relevant natural terms ("rendered HTML", "meter elements", "accessible names", "screen-reader output") but inserts the literal rule title "Provide accessible names for meter elements" as a trigger and omits common variations like "meter", "label", or "ARIA". It is not a 3 because the title-as-trigger phrasing is not something a user would naturally say and variations are missing.

The "meter elements" niche is specific, but the broad preamble "reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns" is shared across sibling accessibility rule skills and could overlap them. It is not a 3 because that generic preamble weakens distinctiveness, and not a 1 because the meter-element focus does narrow the niche.