Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, concise accessibility review skill that uses progressive disclosure effectively by keeping a lean overview and deferring detailed examples and verification to a single real reference file; it loses points on actionability and workflow clarity because the body lacks an inline code example and explicit verification checkpoints.
Suggestions
Include one small inline HTML snippet (a role="progressbar" with aria-label) so the skill is actionable without opening the reference.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint in the body (e.g. 'Confirm the accessible name appears in the accessibility tree/axe before considering the rule satisfied') to close the feedback loop.
Tighten the Check/Fix sections to reference the specific attribute pattern rather than restating the same guidance twice.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude knows what a progress bar and ARIA are, and adds only the rule-specific guidance (label requirements, value attributes, decorative-div caveat) without restating basics. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives specific, actionable checks (use aria-label/aria-labelledby, avoid 'progress', provide aria-valuenow/min/max) but the body itself has no executable code or markup example — that concrete example lives only in references/rule.md. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections sequence the review work, but there are no explicit verification checkpoints or feedback loops in the body itself; verification guidance is deferred to the reference file. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a concise overview with one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/rule.md, confirmed to exist) holding the full examples and verification steps; navigation is explicit and content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |