Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured overview that correctly defers detailed code and verification to references/rule.md (one level deep). Its weaknesses are mild internal redundancy and guidance that stays directional rather than executable, with verification checkpoints left implicit.
Suggestions
Tighten redundancy: the 'no interactive/focusable children inside role=text' rule appears in the opening paragraph, Quick Reference, and Check section — consolidate to one statement and one scannable bullet list.
Make the verification loop explicit in the body: after Fix, add a 'Re-check' step (re-run the accessibility tree inspection / keyboard test and confirm the fix holds) rather than only 'note how to verify the fix'.
Surface one concrete inline verification cue — e.g., 'inspect the browser accessibility tree' or 'run axe/Lighthouse' — instead of the generic 'browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech', so the body is actionable without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the 'no interactive/focusable children inside role=text' point is restated three times — the opening 'effectively hides any interactive elements', the Quick Reference 'should not contain interactive children', and the Check 'verify they do not contain any focusable elements' — so it could be tightened rather than earning 'every token earns its place'. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete direction is present ('Remove role="text" from containers that have interactive children or move the interactive elements outside'), but executable specifics — tool commands and code examples — are deferred to references/rule.md, and verification is only 'browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech', leaving key details in the reference. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence exists, but validation is only a passing 'note how to verify the fix' with no explicit validate→fix→re-verify checkpoint, so checkpoints are implicit rather than the explicit feedback loop of the top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview points cleanly to one-level-deep detail — 'For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md' — and rule.md is a real, self-contained file with no nested references, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |