Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized overview with excellent progressive disclosure to a verified one-level reference. The body itself is held back by mild redundancy, explanation of known concepts, and a lack of in-body verification checkpoints and executable examples.
Suggestions
Cut the explanatory intro and de-duplicate Quick Reference against the Check section so the body stays lean.
Add a short in-body verification step (e.g., "Confirm with axe/Lighthouse or the browser accessibility tree") so the workflow has an explicit checkpoint without forcing a jump to the reference.
Include one minimal in-body code snippet (a tooltip with aria-describedby) so the Check/Fix guidance is immediately actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The intro explains concepts Claude already knows ("Tooltips often contain essential information...") and Quick Reference overlaps the Check section, so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete hints like role="tooltip" and aria-describedby are present, but executable examples are offloaded to the reference and Code Review gives direction ("Flag exact elements...") rather than copy-ready checks. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections imply a sequence, but no verification or validation checkpoints appear in the body itself (they live only in references/rule.md). | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear, sectioned overview points to a single well-signaled reference ("see references/rule.md"), which exists and is one level deep — matching the clean progressive-disclosure anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |