Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a clean one-level reference, but it carries some restatement and lacks an inline executable markup example, capping conciseness and actionability at level 2.
Suggestions
Add a short, copy-paste-ready HTML breadcrumb snippet in the body so actionability does not depend on the external reference.
Drop or condense the intro 'helps screen reader users... improving SEO' sentence and de-duplicate the Check/Fix sections against the Quick Reference to tighten token use.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with concise Quick Reference bullets, but the intro sentence explains a concept Claude already knows and the Check/Fix sections restate the bullets, so it could be tightened; not a 1 because it is not padded or verbose overall. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Attribute-level guidance is concrete ('nav element with aria-label=\'Breadcrumb\'', 'aria-current=\'page\''), but there is no complete executable markup example inline — examples are deferred to the reference — so it falls short of copy-paste-ready level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose review skill with an unambiguous action sequenced through Check/Fix/Code Review; the simple-skill carve-out allows a 3 without explicit multi-step validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections plus a clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer to a real references/rule.md file match the level-3 anchor; not a 2 because the reference is clearly signaled rather than buried. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |