Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured overview body with excellent progressive disclosure to a real, one-level-deep reference file. Its weakness is actionability: the body's own guidance stays at the directive level (especially the 'Check' section) with all executable examples deferred to the reference rather than including one inline snippet.
Suggestions
Add one inline good/bad markup snippet (e.g., '<button aria-label="Close modal"><svg>...</svg></button>' vs an unlabeled icon button) so the Fix guidance is executable without opening the reference.
Make the 'Check' section concrete: specify how to scan (e.g., inspect rendered DOM for <button> elements lacking text content, aria-label, or aria-labelledby, or run the browser's accessibility tree/audit panel).
Tighten the 'Explain' and 'Code Review' sections into one short bullet list to trim the template-like wording.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Sections are short and lean with no heavy padding, but the opening sentence ('Buttons without accessible names are announced as button by screen readers...') restates a concept Claude already knows, and the 'Explain'/'Code Review' sections are slightly wordy. Matches 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The 'Fix' section names concrete techniques ('text content, an aria-label, or an aria-labelledby reference') but the body contains no code or selector examples, and the 'Check' section is vague ('Scan for buttons that lack descriptive text or accessible labels') with no concrete detection method — the executable examples live only in the deferred reference file. Matches 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is present, and verification is mentioned ('note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech'). Not 5 because verification stays general with no explicit validate-and-retry checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview (Quick Reference / Check / Fix / Explain / Code Review) with a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md', verified to exist and contain the code examples and details). Content is appropriately split between overview and reference, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |