Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-organized with a clean workflow and a properly signaled one-level reference. Its main weakness is actionability: the inline guidance stays abstract while executable detail lives only in the reference.
Suggestions
Add one small inline executable snippet (e.g., a curl command to inspect Cache-Control/cf-ray headers) so the body is actionable without forcing a reference load.
Give at least one concrete 'Check' signal (e.g., 'look for cf-ray or x-amz-cf-id response headers') rather than only 'Check if static assets are served from a CDN'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~30 lines), assumes Claude's competence, and avoids explaining CDN concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Inline guidance is high-level ('Configure a CDN to serve static assets with proper caching headers') with no executable code or commands in the body itself; concrete examples are deferred to the reference. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review sequence is clear, and the Code Review section explicitly requires confirming the issue via measurement before recommending changes, providing a verification checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference to references/rule.md (a real file), with content appropriately split rather than inlined. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |