Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-structured overview with excellent progressive disclosure to one real reference file, but it is only moderately actionable and its workflow lacks inline validation checkpoints. The brief E-E-A-T framing intro adds minor token overhead.
Suggestions
Tighten the opening E-E-A-T sentence or drop it; Claude already knows what E-E-A-T trustworthiness means, so the framing is unnecessary context.
Make the 'Check' step concrete with a pass/fail criterion, e.g. 'For each factual claim (statistics, quotes, dates), confirm an external authoritative link exists; flag any claim lacking one.'
Surface a short inline verification checkpoint in the body (e.g. 'After adding links, confirm each opens to the cited source and uses descriptive anchor text') rather than relying entirely on references/rule.md for validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and sectioned into tight bullets, but the opening sentence ('Citing authoritative sources is a key trust signal for E-E-A-T, demonstrating that your content is well-researched...') explains a concept Claude already knows and the E-E-A-T framing could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives some concrete guidance with examples ('Add external links to reputable websites (e.g., .gov, .edu, or industry leaders)', 'Use descriptive anchor text') and directs flagging exact routes/templates, but the 'Check' step ('Review the content for any factual claims that should be backed up') stays general and lacks a concrete pass/fail criterion. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is present and the Code Review section mentions describing how to verify the final page output, but explicit validation checkpoints and a validate→fix→retry feedback loop live only in the referenced file, not inline in the body. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that delegates details to a single, clearly signaled one-level reference ('see references/rule.md'), and that bundle file exists, matching the well-organized overview-plus-reference pattern. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |