Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable body that delegates implementation detail cleanly to a verified reference file, with its main weakness being redundancy between the Check and Code Review sections that could be merged for token efficiency. Adding one small inline code snippet (e.g. <html dir="rtl"> or <bdi>{{ username }}</bdi>) would close the actionability gap.
Suggestions
Merge the overlapping 'Check' and 'Code Review' sections into one review-procedure section to remove the duplicated guidance about rendered markup and user-generated inline content.
Include one or two copy-paste-ready markup snippets inline (e.g. '<html lang="ar" dir="rtl">' and '<bdi>{{ username }}</bdi>') so the main actions are executable without opening the reference.
Replace the vague 'Explain' section with a one-line concrete explanation of what to communicate (e.g. 'Explain that dir tells the browser and screen reader the base direction, fixing punctuation, layout mirroring, and reading order').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with no concept padding, but the 'Check' and 'Code Review' sections restate each other (both describe reviewing rendered markup and user-generated inline content) and 'Explain' is a vague directive, so it fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than the minor-trim anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete directives with exact attribute values and elements ('Set dir="rtl" on <html> for Arabic, Hebrew, Persian, Urdu', 'Use dir="auto"', 'Use <bdi>'), leaving only a minor gap since all executable code examples live in references/rule.md rather than inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check -> Fix -> Explain sequence for a single-pass review skill (no destructive/batch operations, so no validation cap applies), but the duplicated Check/Code Review framing and absence of any verification checkpoint keep it below the fully unambiguous single-action anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-sectioned overview with an explicit one-level-deep pointer ('For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md'); the referenced file exists and contains exactly that content, and the bulk detail is appropriately split out of SKILL.md. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |