Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise review skill with concrete accessibility rules, embedded verification steps, and a clean one-level reference to the detailed rule. Main gap is the absence of an explicit post-fix validation loop and the body duplicating a little rationale from the reference.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Verify' step after 'Fix' (e.g., re-check the rendered focus ring across breakpoints and interaction states) to close the validation loop.
Trim the WCAG rationale in the intro paragraph since it is repeated in references/rule.md, keeping only the rule statement in the body.
Consider including one minimal :focus-visible code snippet inline so the Fix step is copy-paste ready without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with bulleted concrete rules and short sectioned guidance; the WCAG intro paragraph lightly duplicates rationale found in the reference and could be trimmed, but no severe padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable specifics — ':focus-visible', '3:1 contrast ratio', 'at least 2px solid outline with an offset', and selectors to find — though no copy-paste code lives in the body itself (it is in the reference). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence with verification checkpoints embedded in Check ('verify the ring cannot be clipped', 'verify the visible focus ring follows the actual interactive element'); minor gaps as it lacks an explicit post-fix validation loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview sections with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and the referenced file exists in the bundle. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |