Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable audit skill body that cleanly separates overview/process from detailed code examples via a one-level reference. The main gap is the missing in-body validation loop telling Claude to re-test at 320px after applying fixes.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step in the body (e.g., 'After applying fixes, re-test at 320px to confirm no horizontal scrollbar remains') so the feedback loop does not require opening the reference.
De-duplicate the WCAG 2.1 SC 1.4.10 reflow explanation that appears in the intro, Quick Reference, and Explain sections.
Inline one or two of the most common fix code blocks (e.g., the max-width and overflow-wrap fixes) so the body is actionable without the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and actionable with concrete property guidance, but the WCAG reflow explanation is restated across the intro, Quick Reference, and Explain sections and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific remediation (e.g., 'max-width: Npx plus width: 100%', 'overflow-wrap: break-word', 'overflow-x: auto' on the table wrapper), but copy-paste code blocks are deferred to references/rule.md rather than inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check (six-point list) to Fix (six-step) sequence is present, but there is no explicit post-fix re-verification feedback loop in the body — the verification procedure lives only in the reference file. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-labeled sections and a single well-signaled one-level-deep reference to references/rule.md, which is self-contained (verified) and holds the code examples; content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |