Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient overview that correctly defers detail to a single one-level-deep reference, but the body's own Check/Fix guidance is abstract and lacks the verification checkpoints needed for full workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete hreflang snippet or the exact verification step (e.g. check reciprocal links / x-default) directly in the body rather than deferring all code to the reference.
Surface a brief validation/verification checkpoint in the Check or Code Review section so the audit workflow has an explicit pass/fail signal in the body.
Replace the tautological 'Check if this multilingual website properly implements hreflang tags' with a specific, ordered audit procedure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~40 lines with terse sections and a concise Quick Reference; every section earns its place and it does not pad with library or concept explanations, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The Quick Reference gives concrete facts (x-default, reciprocal links, ISO 639-1/3166-1 codes) but the Fix/Check sections are abstract ('Add appropriate hreflang tags') and all executable code is deferred to the reference, so guidance is incomplete in the body itself. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review provide a loose sequence but there are no explicit validation or verification checkpoints in the body (those live only in the reference file), matching the steps-listed-but-checkpoints-missing anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview that points to a real, one-level-deep `references/rule.md` for full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, with well-signaled navigation and appropriately split content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |