Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured overview for a simple single-purpose rule: concrete check/fix guidance, an explicit verification command, and a properly signaled one-level reference. Only minor trims to already-known rationale and slightly deferred executable config keep it from the top conciseness and actionability anchors.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with well-scoped sections and no padding, but the intro sentence explaining attack exposure and the 'so browsers and search engines cache the redirect' rationale restate knowledge Claude already has and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics are provided — 'HTTP 301', 'https://$host$request_uri', 'curl -I http://example.com', and checking the 'redirect Location header' for path and query preservation — but no executable server configuration is inlined, leaving minor gaps covered by the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill with an unambiguous action, and the Check → Fix flow includes an explicit validation step ('Verify the redirect with curl -I http://example.com'), satisfying the simple-skill exception; the operation is not destructive or batch, so no validation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview and appropriately defers implementation details to a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), which exists in the bundle and matches the body's framing. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |