Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise single-purpose audit skill with clear acceptance criteria and proper progressive disclosure to a real reference file. The main weaknesses are minor redundancy between the Quick Reference and Check sections and the absence of concrete check commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Check' section nearly duplicates the Quick Reference bullets ('Verify the TLS certificate is valid, not expired, and covers all hostnames. Confirm HTTP requests redirect to HTTPS with a 301 status code') and 'Explain' is boilerplate that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete acceptance criteria are given (301 redirect, valid cert covering all hostnames, Let's Encrypt/Certbot, SSL Labs A/A+), and implementation commands are appropriately deferred to references/rule.md which contains executable certbot and nginx config. Minor gaps remain, e.g. no CLI check command such as curl -I or openssl s_client in either file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review sequence with verification present ('verify them against the effective production-like response'); as a read-only audit no destructive-operation cap applies. The overlapping roles of 'Check' versus 'Code Review' keep it just below the simple-skill top score. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short overview body with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer ('see references/rule.md') for full implementation details; the referenced file exists and content is appropriately split between overview and reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |