import-on-interaction

Use when reviewing slow initial loads caused by optional features. Prioritize code that is expensive to download or execute and not required for the first viewport, first input, or core task completion.

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, well-structured overview that delegates detail to a real one-level-deep reference file, with a clear Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review flow. Tightening the intro and surfacing one inline code snippet would push it to fully executable.

Suggestions

Trim the opening rationale paragraph to one line; Claude already understands the cost of unused JavaScript.

Inline one minimal dynamic-import() snippet in the Fix section so the body is copy-paste ready without opening the reference.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is compact and mostly assumes Claude's competence, but the opening paragraph restates why deferring code helps ('reduces main-thread work...', 'keeps the first view focused') which is mildly over-explanatory for a concept Claude already knows.	4 / 5
Actionability	Quick Reference and Fix/Code Review sections give concrete, executable direction (dynamic import(), loading feedback), and the linked references/rule.md holds copy-paste ready code; the body itself stops short of inline code, leaving a minor gap versus the rubric's fully copy-paste-ready anchor.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review gives a clear sequenced flow with the verification checklist living in the reference, and the skill is non-destructive so the missing-validation cap does not apply; only minor validation checkpoints are implicit rather than inline.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The body is a lean overview with a single clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md') that exists as a real file, plus a rule-page link — well-organized and easy to navigate.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-scoped description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and concrete prioritization criteria. It would benefit from a few more action verbs and natural synonyms (e.g. 'lazy load', 'defer') to round out coverage.

Suggestions

Add concrete action verbs (e.g. 'Identify and defer...') so the 'what' reads as multiple distinct actions rather than a single prioritization instruction.

Include natural synonyms users say, such as 'lazy loading' or 'deferring optional JavaScript', to broaden trigger term coverage.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (slow initial loads) and several concrete prioritization criteria — 'expensive to download or execute' and 'not required for the first viewport, first input, or core task completion' — but does not enumerate multiple distinct actions, so it stops short of comprehensive coverage.	4 / 5
Completeness	It explicitly answers 'when' via the 'Use when reviewing slow initial loads...' trigger clause and 'what' via the prioritization instruction ('Prioritize code that is expensive...'), satisfying both halves with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural phrases like 'slow initial loads', 'optional features', 'first viewport', and 'first input' are terms a user reviewing performance would say, though common synonyms such as 'lazy load' or 'defer' and specific feature types are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The narrow trigger ('slow initial loads caused by optional features' combined with first-viewport/input/core-task framing) carves a clear niche with minimal overlap against other performance skills.	5 / 5
	Total	18 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Path: skills/import-on-interaction/SKILL.md
Commit: 30756a7

Reviewed: 15 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.