invalid-links

Use when auditing a page's link elements for crawlability, reviewing JavaScript-heavy SPAs where navigation may not use `<a href>` tags, or checking that dynamically generated links have valid href values.

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/invalid-links/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-organized, actionable audit skill with concrete criteria and copy-paste HTML examples, appropriately delegating detail to a single existing reference. Minor redundancy across Quick Reference/Check/Explain and the absence of an explicit report-verification step keep it just below top marks.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean with concrete flagging criteria and before/after HTML, but the 'Explain' section restates Google's crawlability rules already implied by the intro and Quick Reference, and Quick Reference overlaps the Check section.	4 / 5
Actionability	Concrete, actionable guidance: five precise href-flagging categories (empty, javascript:, mailto:/tel:, fragment, missing) and copy-paste before/after HTML examples for the common cases, with minor gaps (no automated query command).	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear read-only audit sequence (Quick Reference → Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review) with a concrete 'report the count per type' step; this is a non-destructive audit so the validation cap does not apply, though no explicit verification of the produced report is specified.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-structured sections keep the overview inline and delegate full implementation, code examples, and framework guidance to a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (references/rule.md), which exists as a real bundle file.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and concrete audit actions targeted at a narrow SEO niche. It is largely comprehensive but slightly overlaps related SEO skills and omits a few common trigger synonyms.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists several concrete actions — 'auditing a page's link elements for crawlability', 'reviewing JavaScript-heavy SPAs where navigation may not use `<a href>` tags', 'checking that dynamically generated links have valid href values' — though they are variations on the same core task rather than distinct capabilities, leaving minor coverage gaps.	4 / 5
Completeness	An explicit 'Use when...' clause gives concrete trigger phrases and the leading verbs ('auditing', 'reviewing', 'checking') state what the skill does, clearly answering both what and when.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Natural terms a user might say are well covered ('auditing', 'crawlability', 'links', 'href', 'JavaScript-heavy SPAs', 'dynamically generated links'), but common variations like 'SEO', 'broken links', or 'PageRank' are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The SEO-link-crawlability niche with its SPA and dynamic-link framing is mostly distinct from sibling skills, with only minor overlap risk against broader SEO auditing skills.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Path: skills/invalid-links/SKILL.md
Commit: 30756a7

Reviewed: 15 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.