Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview that practices good progressive disclosure by deferring code and deep detail to references/rule.md. It is held back by a redundant 'Explain' section, overlap between 'Check' and 'Code Review', and the absence of any inline executable examples or verification step.
Suggestions
Remove or trim the 'Explain' section, which restates how LLMs extract text from HTML — knowledge Claude already has — to recover token budget.
Merge the overlapping 'Check' and 'Code Review' lists into a single deduplicated checklist to remove redundancy and sharpen the workflow.
Add one inline verification checkpoint (e.g., validating JSON-LD with Schema.org's validator) so the audit workflow has an explicit pass/fail step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most of the body is efficient and actionable, but the 'Explain' section restates how LLMs parse HTML (concepts Claude already knows) and the 'Check' and 'Code Review' sections overlap, so it is mostly efficient with some removable explanation rather than fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete specifics (JSON-LD Article/FAQPage/HowTo, h1→h2→h3, article/section/main) but provides no inline executable code — the copy-paste-ready examples are deferred to references/rule.md — so guidance is concrete but incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections are organized into a check→fix→review flow, but 'Check' and 'Code Review' redundantly list overlapping checks and there is no explicit verification checkpoint, so the sequence is present but not fully clean. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference — 'see references/rule.md' for full details and code — and that file exists, matching the well-signaled one-level-deep reference anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |