Conciseness

The ~45-line body is lean and assumes Claude's intelligence, but the opening paragraph ("a thumbs-up is a vulgar gesture in parts of the Middle East and West Africa, and a checkmark means 'wrong' in Japan") duplicates the 'Why It Matters' content in references/rule.md verbatim, and the Quick Reference bullets partially restate the Check section. This matches anchor 4 ('Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed') rather than 5, where every token would earn its place.

Actionability

The Check and Code Review sections are concrete about what to flag ("hand gestures, color symbolism, animals, or religious imagery", "hardcoded image paths", "flag icons used to represent languages", "embedded text"), but the Fix section is abstract — "implement a locale-aware image lookup with a neutral fallback" — with no code, command, or pattern shown in the body. This matches anchor 3 ('Some concrete guidance but incomplete... missing key details'); it is not a 4 because the how-to-execute portion is entirely deferred to the reference file.

Workflow Clarity

The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is clear and unambiguous for this simple, single-purpose review skill, matching anchor 4 ('Clear sequence with most checkpoints present'). It is not a 3 (sequence is coherent, not gap-ridden) nor a 5 (there is no explicit verification step confirming that flagged images were actually overridden or replaced).

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview and defers all implementation detail to a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference — "For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md" — and references/rule.md exists and contains that detail. This matches anchor 5 ('Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references; content appropriately split; easy navigation').

Specificity

The description names the domain precisely ("image assets, icon libraries, or components that render illustrations") and one concrete action ("identify culture-specific content"), but the only other capabilities are framed as what the content "may need" ("locale overrides or replacement with neutral alternatives") rather than actions the skill performs. This matches the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'; it is not a 4 because it does not list several distinct specific actions.

Completeness

Both what and when are explicit: the what is "identify culture-specific content that may need locale overrides or replacement with neutral alternatives", and the when is a concrete "Use when reviewing..." clause naming three trigger contexts. This clearly matches anchor 5 ('Clearly and explicitly answers both what AND when with concrete trigger phrases'); it is not a 4 because the when-clause is already explicit and specific, not merely implied or generic.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are present: "image assets", "icon libraries", "illustrations", "culture-specific", "locale overrides", "neutral alternatives". It falls short of anchor 5 because common synonyms users actually use are missing — "i18n", "internationalization", "SVG", "graphics", "localization".

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The i18n image-review niche ("culture-specific content", "locale overrides", "neutral alternatives") is distinct from generic asset skills, matching anchor 4 ('Mostly distinct; minor overlap risk'). It is not a 5 because "reviewing image assets, icon libraries" overlaps with sibling i18n/locale-checklist skills and general image-review skills, and no synonym like 'i18n' sharpens the boundary further.