Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-organized with a clear single action and a properly signaled one-level reference, but it carries some redundancy between sections and lacks an in-body executable example, withholding full actionability and conciseness scores.
Suggestions
Inline one short executable example (e.g. an .htaccess 301 or Next.js config snippet) so the body is copy-paste ready without opening rule.md.
Collapse the 'Quick Reference' bullets into the Check/Fix sections to remove the restated guidance.
Trim the repeated 'why refreshes are disruptive' explanation, keeping it only in rule.md where the detail belongs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but the 'Quick Reference' bullets restate the Check/Fix guidance and the intro plus rule.md both re-explain why refreshes disrupt users, so some tokens do not earn their place. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete remedy ('Use server-side redirects (301 or 302) instead of client-side meta refreshes') but includes no executable code/config snippet in the body itself — the only example lives in references/rule.md. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single, simple rule with an unambiguous action (avoid meta refresh; use 301/302 server-side) and clear section organization, so the simple-skill allowance applies. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a clearly signaled, verified one-level reference ('see references/rule.md') and the bundle file exists and is appropriately detailed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |