Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean overview that practices good progressive disclosure by deferring implementation detail and code to a single real reference file. Its weaknesses are that the body's guidance is concrete but not executable on its own and the review process is presented as modes rather than an explicit sequenced workflow with validation feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add a short, copy-paste-ready snippet (e.g. a minimal <input type='password' autocomplete='current-password'> example) directly in the Fix section so the body is actionable without opening the reference.
Reframe Code Review as an explicit numbered sequence with a validation feedback loop, e.g. 1) inspect headers/forms/cookies, 2) flag violations, 3) verify each against a production-like response, 4) re-check after fixes.
Tighten the 'Explain' section or merge it into Check/Fix to remove mild redundancy and the one concept-explanation intro sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well under 50 lines: terse Quick Reference bullets plus short Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review stanzas, deferring all code and detail to references/rule.md; it is not a 2 because the only mild concept orientation (one intro sentence) does not pad the skill with material Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives some concrete guidance (specific values like autocomplete='new-password'/'current-password' in Fix) but the body itself contains no executable code or copy-paste examples — those are deferred to the reference — and Code Review phrases like 'verify them against the effective production-like response' are abstract, so it sits below the fully-executable top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Content is organized into task modes (Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review) and Code Review mentions a 'verify ... against the effective production-like response' checkpoint, but there is no explicit numbered sequence or feedback loop (flag -> verify -> re-check), so it does not reach the clear-sequence-with-validation top anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | SKILL.md is a concise overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), which exists and contains no further nested file pointers; the split is appropriate and easy to navigate, matching the top anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |