Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clean, well-structured overview for a simple audit skill: concrete check/fix guidance, an explicit flag condition, and an appropriately deferred one-level reference that exists and delivers the promised code examples. The main weakness is redundancy — the Check and Code Review sections repeat each other and the intro sentence is duplicated in Explain.
Suggestions
Merge the "Check" and "Code Review" sections, which cover the same checks (contact page/footer presence, address completeness, <address> element, schema cross-reference) with nearly identical wording.
Remove the verbatim-duplicated intro sentence from the "Explain" section, keeping only the new local-SEO consistency rationale.
Optionally inline one minimal <address> snippet in the Fix section so the fix is copy-paste ready without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with no concept padding, but the "Check" and "Code Review" sections near-duplicate each other (both: check contact page and footer, verify address completeness, check the <address> element, cross-reference LocalBusiness schema, flag if missing), and the intro sentence reappears verbatim in "Explain". Fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient but could be tightened), not 4 due to this noticeable redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable: "Verify the address is complete (street, city, state/region, postal code, country)", "Wrap it in an <address> HTML element", "Ensure the address exactly matches ... your LocalBusiness JSON-LD schema and your Google Business Profile", with complete code examples one level deep in references/rule.md. Minor gap: nothing copy-paste ready inline, so anchor 4 rather than 5; far more specific than pseudocode-level anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-task audit skill and the Check → Fix → Explain sequence is unambiguous, including an explicit audit outcome ("Flag if no address is found on either contact page or footer"). Per the simple-skill guideline a single unambiguous action scores 5; the operation is read-only, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear, well-organized overview with a single well-signaled one-level-deep reference ("For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md"), and the bundle confirms references/rule.md exists and holds exactly that content (code examples, JSON-LD, microdata, legal and exception details). Content is appropriately split between overview and reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |