Conciseness

Multiple padded/duplicated sections: 'Code Review' restates 'Check' almost verbatim (follow each href, check response code, report source page and destination), 'Explain' re-teaches SEO concepts Claude already knows ('PageRank is partially lost at each hop', crawl budget) that the intro and Quick Reference already state. This matches 'noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' rather than the mostly-efficient anchor 3.

Actionability

'For each <a href=...> tag, follow the URL and check the HTTP response code. Flag any internal link that resolves to a 301 or 302' is concrete procedural guidance with clear reporting fields (source page, href, redirect chain, final URL). However, no executable command or code is given (e.g., a curl loop, a crawler invocation, or a grep for href extraction) — the how is left entirely to inference, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details'.

Workflow Clarity

The Check → Fix sequence is present and readable, but validation checkpoints are absent: after batch-updating hrefs there is no verify step (re-crawl to confirm direct 200s, diff report of changed links). Per the rubric, a batch operation without a feedback loop is capped at 3 even though the sequence itself is clear.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a lean overview (quick-reference bullets plus Check/Fix summaries) that delegates implementation detail via a clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer: 'For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md' — and references/rule.md exists in the bundle. No nested or buried references, matching 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references'.

Specificity

Names the domain ('auditing internal link structure' after 'URL migration, domain change, or site rebuild') with one concrete action — auditing — but never states what the audit produces (detecting redirect chains, flagging links, updating hrefs). This matches 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'; it is above score 2 because 'auditing internal link structure' is a specific action, not generic handling.

Completeness

The 'when' is explicit and concrete ('Use when auditing internal link structure after a URL migration, domain change, or site rebuild'), and a 'what' is present ('auditing internal link structure'), though weak — the actual outputs (detect redirect chains, report, update hrefs) are unstated. Fits 'has both what and when; when/what could be more explicit'; not 5 because the what is only implied by the trigger clause, and not 3 because the when is explicit, not missing.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases users would say: 'URL migration', 'domain change', 'site rebuild', 'redirects', 'internal link structure'. Below 5 because common variations like 'redirect chain', '301', 'link cleanup', or 'internal links' (plural, standalone) are missing; above 3 because coverage goes beyond a single generic keyword.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The migration/domain-change triggers carve a clear niche distinct from generic SEO or link-audit skills. Minor overlap risk remains because 'Applies to any site that has had redirects in place for more than a month' is very broad — most production sites qualify — so it could fire on general link-audit requests.