Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise overview that points cleanly to a single reference file for depth. It scores high on progressive disclosure and actionability, with only minor conciseness redundancy and no destructive-operation concerns to validate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean—Quick Reference bullets plus short Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections—assuming Claude's competence; the only redundancy is mild overlap between Quick Reference and the Check/Fix sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable directives are present ('Use @media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) to disable animations', 'no flashing exceeds 3 flashes/second'); full code examples are deferred to the reference file, which is appropriate for an instruction-oriented skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear review sequence (Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review) with an explicit verification checkpoint ('note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | An under-50-line overview with well-organized sections and a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer to references/rule.md (verified to exist), keeping navigation simple. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |