Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, token-efficient overview that correctly defers detail to a single real reference file, but its in-body guidance lacks the concrete conversion details and explicit verification checkpoints needed to be fully actionable on its own.
Suggestions
Add the rem conversion rule (e.g., "rem = px / 16" with one inline example) so the Fix step is executable without opening the reference.
Surface a brief verification checkpoint in the body (e.g., "Confirm computed styles match in DevTools before shipping") rather than relying solely on rule.md.
Consider one inline code snippet (good vs. bad px/rem) in the Quick Reference to make the rule immediately actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: a short rationale, a quick-reference bullet list, and one-line Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections, deferring detail to rule.md; it does not over-explain concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete direction is present ("Find all px-based font-size, width, and padding values", "Convert fixed px font sizes to rem equivalents", "Flag exact selectors"), but key details like the rem conversion (divide px by 16) and code examples are missing from the body and only live in the reference. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is present, but validation/verification checkpoints are only implicit in the body (the explicit verification steps live in rule.md), leaving a checkpoint gap. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer to the real references/rule.md file, and content is appropriately split between overview and detailed reference. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |