Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable testing skill with good progressive disclosure, weakened by an 'Explain' section that re-teaches known concepts and a workflow that lacks an explicit re-test verification loop.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the 'Explain' section's background on screen readers and the accessibility tree; assume Claude's competence and keep only non-obvious quirks.
Add an explicit feedback loop in the workflow, e.g. 'After each fix, re-run the screen reader navigation to confirm the announcement/name/role/state is now correct.'
Cut the motivational opening paragraph or condense it to one line so the actionable content starts sooner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Quick Reference, Check, and Fix are tight and concrete, but the 'Explain' section restates concepts Claude already knows (what screen readers are, the accessibility tree, reading vs forms mode) and the intro is partly motivational padding. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives specific executable guidance — exact screen-reader keys (H, D/R, Insert+F7) and exact ARIA fixes (aria-live='polite', roving tabindex, aria-describedby) — which meets the actionability bar for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check→Fix sequence is present, but the re-test/verify feedback loop is only implicit (a passing nod in Code Review) rather than an explicit validation checkpoint after each fix. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) that points to a real one-level-deep reference, references/rule.md, with a clearly signaled link. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |