Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A clean, well-structured single-purpose rule skill that delegates detail to references/rule.md. It would score higher by removing the duplicated explanatory sentence, naming concrete verification tools, and adding an explicit validation checkpoint.
Suggestions
Remove the near-verbatim duplicate of the opening sentence in the Explain section to tighten conciseness.
Replace 'verify it feels native' / 'browser accessibility tooling' with named checks (e.g., specific keyboard/screen-reader tests or DevTools panels) to improve actionability.
Add an explicit validation step in the Check/Fix loop (e.g., 'After removing the override, re-test keyboard scroll and reduced-motion to confirm native behavior is restored').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with no concept padding, but the opening sentence and the 'Explain' section repeat the same phrase about disrupting navigation and assistive technologies nearly verbatim, which is unnecessary duplication. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance ('Remove JavaScript that overrides default scroll behavior', 'respect prefers-reduced-motion') is appropriate for an instruction-only skill, but 'verify it feels native' and 'browser accessibility tooling' are vague without named tools or commands. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Check/Fix/Explain sections give a clear sequence for this simple skill, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint to confirm a fix actually restores native scrolling. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep pointer to the verified references/rule.md, and well-organized sections — appropriate for a short single-purpose skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |