Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-structured audit skill body that delegates implementation detail to a single clearly-signaled reference and provides concrete actionable checks and fixes. Adding an inline schema snippet and an explicit validate-flag-retry loop would round it out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized with short Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections and assumes Claude's knowledge; minor redundancy (LocalBusiness+areaServed and the 300-word target each recur) keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance is present (title format `[Service] in [City]`, `LocalBusiness` schema with `areaServed`, 'at least 300 words of unique content'), and code lives appropriately in the reference; minor gaps (no inline schema snippet) hold it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review gives a clear sequence with verification cues ('Verify each page has unique content', 'Flag pages that appear to be thin templated clones', 'describe how to verify the final page output'), though explicit validate-fix-retry checkpoints are only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep navigation to the real `references/rule.md` file, and detailed material (code example, URL structure, checklists, verification) is correctly split into that reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |