Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized review skill that uses progressive disclosure effectively and routes detail to a real reference file. The recurring weakness is repetition across sections and guidance that stays somewhat abstract without the referenced detail.
Suggestions
Collapse the overlap between Quick Reference, Check, and Code Review into a single checklist to remove restated points.
Inline one or two concrete examples (e.g. an accessible timeout-warning snippet or an autosave trigger) so the body is actionable without forcing a jump to rule.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the Quick Reference bullets and the Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections restate the same checks multiple times (e.g. 'Review authenticated flows...' vs 'Review authenticated forms, checkout flows, editors...'), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Names specific things to check and fix ('offer turn off, adjust, or extend behavior', 'restore the user to the same step'), but concrete implementation is deferred to references/rule.md rather than given inline. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A simple single-purpose review skill with an unambiguous action, organized into clear Check/Fix/Explain phases that sequence the work. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is a concise overview that clearly signals one-level-deep detail ('see references/rule.md' for implementation details and examples), and the referenced file exists. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |