Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, concise overview with a clear check-fix-review workflow and a properly signaled one-level reference to the implementation details. Its main weakness is that the actionable share-URL templates live only in the reference rather than being inline in the Fix section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~30 lines) with tight bullets in Quick Reference and short Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections; it assumes Claude's competence and does not pad with background Claude already knows, with every section earning its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The Fix section gives specific direction ("construct share URLs", "Use `window.location.href`", "Include `og:title` and `og:image`") but the executable detail — the actual platform share URL schemes — is deferred to references/rule.md rather than shown inline, so it is not copy-paste ready within the body. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is clear, and verification is explicit throughout ("Verify they use the correct share URL format", "Verify no heavy third-party share scripts are loaded", "describe how to verify the final page output"), which is appropriate for this simple single-purpose skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ("see `references/rule.md`"), and that reference file exists and holds the detailed code and platform guide, so content is appropriately split with easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |