Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-organized, and uses progressive disclosure correctly with a real single-level reference. Its main weaknesses are a lack of executable commands or config examples and no explicit validation checkpoints in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable guidance — e.g. the `npm install --save-dev stylelint stylelint-config-standard` command, a minimal `.stylelintrc.json` snippet, and the `npx stylelint "**/*.{css,scss}"` run command.
Include a validation checkpoint in the workflow, such as "Run the lint command and only proceed with the fix once no errors remain; re-lint after auto-fixing".
Move or summarize the most actionable rule examples from `references/rule.md` into the Fix section so the core skill is self-contained for common cases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — tight Quick Reference bullets and short Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections — and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what CSS or Stylelint is, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools ("Stylelint with stylelint-config-standard", "stylelint-config-standard-scss") but gives no executable commands or config — no `npm install`, stylelint config file, or lint command — so it instructs rather than providing copy-paste-ready guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections provide a loose sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops; the steps are present yet checkpoints are missing or implicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a clearly signaled one-level reference to `references/rule.md` (a verified real file) in its own pointer section, matching the well-organized one-level-deep reference anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |