Conciseness

The opening paragraph ("A complex illustration exported from Figma can easily be 50-200KB... balloons every page response") and the "Explain" section both restate the same trade-offs Claude already knows and that also appear in references/rule.md — noticeable duplication that could be trimmed to a pointer. Not a 2 because the Quick Reference, Check, and Fix sections are tight and actionable with no filler.

Actionability

Concrete, specific guidance throughout: "flag any over 1KB (approximately 1000 characters)", "Keep inline SVGs under 1KB (ideally under 500 bytes) after SVGO optimisation", and named tools (SVGO, SVGR, SVG sprites). Not a 5 because there are no runnable commands or code examples in the body (e.g., an actual SVGO CLI invocation or before/after markup), so the guidance is executable in intent but not copy-paste ready.

Workflow Clarity

The Check → Fix → Explain sequence is clearly laid out with numbered sub-steps for scanning, measuring, checking reuse, and reporting, and "Show before/after size comparison" acts as a verification checkpoint. Not a 5 because there is no explicit validation/feedback loop (e.g., re-measure after extraction to confirm the size reduction) and the steps are compact prose rather than a checklist.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview with well-organized sections and a single clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ("For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see `references/rule.md`" — verified to exist, 171 lines). Not a 5 because the intro paragraph duplicates rule.md's "Why It Matters" text inline, so the split between overview and reference isn't perfectly clean.

Specificity

"Check encoded size, rendered size, loading strategy, and above-the-fold impact together" lists several specific concrete actions tied to the inline-SVG rule domain. Not a 5 because the core capability is expressed only through the awkward embedded rule title "related to Manage inline SVG size and complexity" rather than fully unpacked verb phrases, leaving minor coverage gaps.

Completeness

Both halves are explicit: the when is "Use when reviewing image assets, markup, and CDN or build transforms related to..." and the what is "Check encoded size, rendered size, loading strategy, and above-the-fold impact together" plus the named rule. It clearly matches the anchor-5 example pattern (concrete what + explicit 'Use when' with concrete trigger phrases), and is above anchor 4 where 'when' would be only implicit or weaker.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms users would say are present: "inline SVG", "image assets", "markup", "CDN or build transforms", "encoded size". Not a 5 because common variations like "SVG sprite", "optimize SVG", "SVGO", or "icons" are missing, so coverage is good but not comprehensive.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The inline-SVG size/complexity niche has distinct triggers and would rarely fire for unrelated skills. Not a 5 because the broad framing "reviewing image assets, markup, and CDN or build transforms" overlaps with sibling image-optimization rules (e.g., image formats, lazy loading) in the same checklist family.