Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clean, concise overview that appropriately pushes code examples and detail into references/rule.md while keeping actionable Check/Fix guidance inline. Minor gains are possible by adding a brief inline verification checkpoint and removing the small intro/Quick-Reference redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, well-sectioned body that assumes competence and avoids explaining basic concepts; minor redundancy where the opening paragraph and Quick Reference bullets restate the same accessibility limitations. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete instruction-only guidance ('Identify images that contain text content', 'Replace text images with real HTML text styled with CSS', 'provide equivalent text in alt attributes', 'Consider using SVG with embedded text'); executable examples are appropriately deferred to references/rule.md. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence for a simple single-purpose skill, with a light verification cue ('note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling'); no explicit validation checkpoint in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and the referenced file exists and holds the detailed examples; easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |