Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured overview that delegates detail to a single real reference file, but it lacks executable code and an explicit post-fix verification step in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add a short executable snippet for finding duplicate IDs (e.g., a querySelectorAll scan) so the Check/Fix steps are actionable without leaving SKILL.md.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after Fix (e.g., 're-scan the rendered HTML to confirm no duplicate IDs remain and that label/ARIA references resolve') to close the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude's competence, and avoids padded concept explanations; the only inefficiency is the 4th Quick Reference bullet nearly duplicating the intro line. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete targets ('labels, ARIA attributes, or JavaScript selectors', 'component libraries') but provides no executable code or commands in the body itself, only descriptive directives. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review gives a sequence, but there is no explicit validate-after-fix checkpoint for what are destructive markup edits, capping clarity at 2 per the rubric note. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with well-organized sections and a clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer to the existing 'references/rule.md' for details; content is appropriately split. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |