Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-sectioned overview that delegates details to a single well-placed reference file — excellent progressive disclosure. Its weaknesses are operational: the core crawl step has no concrete method or tool, and the workflow lacks any explicit verification checkpoint for what is a batch link-editing operation.
Suggestions
Make the Check step executable: name a concrete crawl method or script (e.g., a crawler export or command) for building the internal link graph, instead of just "Crawl the site and build an internal link graph".
Add an explicit verification step to the workflow (e.g., re-crawl the affected page set or check Google Search Console after adding links), or point to the Verification section of references/rule.md from the Fix section.
Remove the duplication between the intro paragraph and the Quick Reference bullets — both state the PageRank/discovery idea twice within a few lines.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The intro paragraph and the Quick Reference bullets both explain the same PageRank/discovery idea ("Internal links are how search engines discover pages and how PageRank flows through a site" vs. "Internal links pass PageRank — more quality internal links to a page signal its importance"), and the opener restates a concept Claude already knows. Mostly tight, but there is unnecessary duplication that could be trimmed. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | "Crawl the site and build an internal link graph" names the step but gives no tool, command, or script to accomplish it, and all executable code examples (HTML link patterns, threshold table) live only in references/rule.md. Concrete numeric guidance exists ("at least 3–5 internal links", orphan = 0 links), so this is partial rather than vague guidance. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sections give a recognizable sequence, but there is no validation checkpoint in the body: verification is only vaguely implied via "describe how to verify the final page output", and adding links across many pages is a batch edit with no re-crawl/verify feedback loop. Per the rubric's cap for batch operations without feedback loops, workflow clarity cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A ~45-line overview with a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference — "see `references/rule.md`" — which is a real file holding the thresholds, code examples, and framework guidance. The split is appropriate (overview inline, details external), matching the anchor for well-structured one-level-deep disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |