Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, high-signal instruction set that assumes Claude's competence and crisply separates the two output cases. The only meaningful gap is the absence of a complete observation XML example.
Suggestions
Include one full `<observation>` example showing title, a couple of facts with paths, and a narrative so the expected output shape is unambiguous.
Add a one-line validation reminder (e.g. confirm exactly one of skip_summary/observation is produced before returning) to strengthen the workflow checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely lean body with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line carries a concrete instruction. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, copy-paste-ready XML snippets (skip_summary, outputClass=prose) and explicit rules, but omits a full worked example of a complete observation XML, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear conditional dispatch (idle/init/no tool results vs finished unit) with explicit do-not rules; it is a simple conditional skill rather than a multi-step pipeline, so minor sequencing gaps keep it just below fully explicit validation/checklist level. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized with bold case labels; per the simple-skill exception this earns full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |