Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary orchestration skill body: tightly written, clearly sequenced with validation gates and stop conditions, and cleanly delegating detail to three real one-level-deep reference files. The single gap is that verification checks are described generically ('run narrow checks') rather than naming the concrete commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is directive ('Reuse adequate existing solutions; do not add packages merely for familiarity') and no trimmable padding was found. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: named reference files, a 30-skill specialist routing table, and a numbered slice procedure, but 'Run narrow checks after each slice' never names concrete commands like 'flutter test' or 'flutter analyze', leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (Preflight, Route specialists, 7 numbered slice steps, Stop conditions) with explicit validation gates and a feedback loop ('resolve material findings within the authorized scope, and rerun affected checks'; 'Do not claim completion while required checks fail'), and no destructive/batch cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Concise overview with three well-signaled, one-level-deep references (project-preflight.md, post-implementation-review.md, delivery-verification.md), each verified on disk and introduced with its purpose ('Read [project preflight] before planning'), with no nested .md references inside them. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |