Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured entrypoint: sequenced workflow with explicit verification, a genuinely useful review checklist, correct API-level snippets, and exemplary one-level-deep reference splitting. The residual gaps are minor — comment-only correct patterns for track() and a few trimmable meta/boilerplate lines.
Suggestions
Trim the Contents block and the trailing "moved out of the entrypoint" meta-comment on the core-implementation reference to tighten conciseness.
Replace the comment-only CORRECT case in the track() mistake with a short executable snippet (building observations and cameraInformation from the sample buffer) or route it explicitly to the core-implementation section that shows it.
Add references/dockkit-errors-and-testing.md to the Route by Task section so error-handling and testing tasks are routed as prominently as implementation tasks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean: terse workflow steps ("Gate the feature on DockKit availability"), four one-line invariants, and mistake snippets with real API calls; nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. Not 5: the Contents block (8 lines for a 144-line file), the slightly long lifecycle code example, and the meta-comment "focused implementation recipes moved out of the entrypoint" are tokens that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable Swift with real DockKit calls ("DockAccessoryManager.shared.setSystemTrackingEnabled(false)", "accessory.animate(motion: .kapow)"), specific rates ("10-30 fps", "limited to 2 calls per second"), and specific guards ("#available(iOS 17.4, *)"). Not 5: the CORRECT pattern for track() is comment-only ("// CORRECT -- call at 10-30 fps") and end-to-end wiring is deferred to references, leaving minor gaps in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-step sequence with explicit validation baked in: step 1 "plan physical-device verification" and step 5 "Verify disconnect/reconnect, tracking loss, subject changes, thermal/battery state, and cancellation", backed by a 17-item Review Checklist and an error-recovery pattern ("DockKit can throw `.frameRateTooHigh`... Set a trajectory, observe its `Progress`"). Not a destructive/batch skill, so no cap applies; checkpoints are explicit, not merely implied. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Verified against the actual bundle: all three referenced files exist (core-implementation.md, dockkit-patterns.md, dockkit-errors-and-testing.md), are exactly one level deep with no cross-nesting, and are well-signaled with scope descriptions ("for accessory discovery, system/custom tracking, framing, motor control, animations, events, and battery state"). The 144-line entrypoint keeps scope/decisions/mistakes/checklist while ~1200 lines of detail live in references — an appropriate split with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |