Conciseness

Each section is one to two sentences of API-specific framing followed by code (e.g., "FamilyControls requires the Family Controls Entitlement…"), with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows and dense, non-obvious notes in Common Mistakes. Matches the lean/every-token-earns-its-place anchor; not 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim.

Actionability

Four complete, executable Swift examples cover the common cases — requestAuthorization, familyActivityPicker with App Group persistence, store.shield assignments with clearAllSettings(), and startMonitoring/stopMonitoring. Copy-paste ready and fully executable; not 4 because the core loop has no gaps (advanced recipes are deliberately and correctly deferred to the reference).

Workflow Clarity

Sections are sequenced in dependency order (authorize → select → shield → monitor) with an explicit prerequisite — "Request authorization via AuthorizationCenter.shared before presenting pickers or configuring stores" — and a Review Checklist covering required handlers. Minor validation gaps remain (no error-recovery path for a .denied authorization status), fitting 4 rather than 5, which requires explicit feedback loops.

Progressive Disclosure

Core usage lives inline while advanced material is split into a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference — [references/screen-time-patterns.md] for "Custom shield configurations, DeviceActivityMonitor extensions, and persistence" — which I verified exists and contains exactly those recipes. Matches the well-signaled one-level-deep references anchor.

Specificity

Lists four concrete actions — "Request Screen Time authorization", "pick apps and web domains", "apply shields", "monitor usage schedules" — each mapped to a named framework, covering the complete authorize-select-enforce-monitor pipeline. This matches the comprehensive-coverage anchor; it is not 4 because the domain's core workflow is fully covered rather than having minor gaps.

Completeness

The "what" is clearly and specifically stated (four concrete framework actions), but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance; "in iOS" conveys platform only, not usage context. Per the guideline, a missing "Use when" clause caps completeness at 3; it is not 4 because the "when" is absent rather than merely imprecise.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user terms like "Screen Time", "apps", "web domains", "shields", and "iOS", but omits common synonyms such as "parental controls", "app limits", or "block apps". Good coverage with a few natural terms missing fits 4; not 5 because synonym coverage is not comprehensive, and not 3 because the key natural phrase "Screen Time" is present.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Screen Time", "FamilyControls", "ManagedSettings", and "DeviceActivity" pin the description to an unambiguous niche in Apple's Screen Time APIs. Clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk matches 5; no adjacent skill would plausibly be triggered by these terms.