Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent instruction-only skill body: lean prescriptive rules, a sequenced audit workflow with explicit re-verification, and clean progressive disclosure into three real, well-scoped reference files. The only minor weakness is that a few directives (announcements, focus restoration, contrast checking) defer their concrete APIs or thresholds entirely to the reference file rather than naming them inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive throughout ("Expose changing state through value or traits, not only color or animation", "Hide decorative content, but never hide information needed to understand state or complete a task") with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line states a project-specific rule, routing decision, or verification requirement, so it matches "every token earns its place". | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is largely concrete — named modifiers (".accessibilityLabel", ".accessibilityAction", ".isButton"), named tools (Accessibility Inspector), named system preferences (Reduce Motion, Reduce Transparency, Differentiate Without Color, Increased Contrast, Button Shapes), and specific routing targets — but a few directives lack their API or invocation in the body ("Announce important asynchronous outcomes" and "restore focus" name no API; contrast has no threshold or Inspector audit step), leaving minor gaps appropriate for anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step Audit Workflow is a clearly sequenced process with an explicit re-validation step ("Re-run automated checks and manually exercise the affected assistive-technology path") forming a fix-then-verify feedback loop, reinforced by a dedicated Verification section and a ten-item Review Checklist — matching "clear sequence with explicit validation steps... checklists for complex processes". | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep references — "Read [Accessibility Patterns](references/a11y-patterns.md) for SwiftUI/UIKit/AppKit recipes, focus management, rotors, and XCTest examples" — and all three referenced files exist with substantive content matching those claims (verified: recipes, focus, rotors, XCTest sections present; no nested .md chains); the split (patterns / media / store declarations) is appropriate and navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |