Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview skill: lean directive sections with executable Swift examples, a useful mistakes/checklist pair, and exemplary progressive disclosure into two substantial reference files. The main weaknesses are small actionability gaps (no LocalizedStringResource or plural-config example) and a mild implement-path sequencing gap.
Suggestions
Add a one-line executable LocalizedStringResource example in the String Types section, since the Review Checklist mandates it but the body never demonstrates it.
Show a concrete plural-variation snippet (e.g., the interpolated key with zero/one/other states in the .xcstrings entry) instead of only mentioning the visual catalog editor.
Trim the Contents TOC (redundant at this length) and tighten Common Mistakes entries that restate generally known i18n pitfalls, keeping only the non-obvious ones like eager localization in static constants.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with short code blocks, but minor tokens could be trimmed: the 10-line Contents TOC in a ~90-line file, and Common Mistakes entries like "Use leading/trailing" and "concatenating strings breaks syntax" that restate widely known i18n pitfalls. Efficient with minor trimmable instances matches score 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Swift snippets for extraction, String(localized:), plural interpolation, and FormatStyle currency/date/relative are executable and copy-paste ready, and the checklist is concrete. Minor gaps keep it below 5: LocalizedStringResource is mandated by the checklist but never shown in code, and plural-variation configuration is described only as happening "in the visual catalog editor" without a concrete example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For the review path the "Review Checklist" provides explicit checkpoints, and sections are logically ordered (catalog → string types → plurals → formatting → RTL), but the implement path is presented as parallel topic sections rather than a sequenced workflow. This lands between the simple-skill exception (5) and the checkpoint-gap level (3), fitting score 4's clear-guidance-with-minor-gaps anchor; no destructive/batch operations apply, so no cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~100-line body is a genuine overview with a TOC and a References section clearly signaling two one-level-deep files (references/formatstyle-locale.md, references/string-catalogs.md), which exist, total ~1,200 lines of real detail, and contain no nested file references. This matches the clear-overview/well-signaled-references anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |