Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered review skill: ordered workflow with explicit verification gates, a concrete output contract, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure to real reference files. The only improvement space is trimming minor duplication (TOC vs. headers, repeated SwiftLint and [weak self] guidance).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence ("Review code as an evidence-backed diff review, not as a style sweep") with no re-teaching of known concepts, but the Contents TOC duplicates the section headers and a few rules appear twice ("[weak self]" guidance in both Common Mistakes and the checklist; SwiftLint deduplication in both Scope and Common Mistakes). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable for an instruction-only skill: a copy-paste-ready output template with exact [FILE:LINE] proof requirements, a concrete command ("swiftlint lint --quiet"), explicit severity calibration ("Critical only for security, data corruption, happy-path crashes, or breaking public API changes"), and a named routing list of specialist skills. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A six-step ordered workflow with explicit verification gates ("Verify each finding. Re-read the exact line and surrounding control flow", "Verify syntax and availability against current primary docs"), false-positive removal feedback, a review checklist, and a dedicated verification-protocol reference. Checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit, so it exceeds anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md body is a concise overview and all five topic-labeled references (concurrency, observation, error-handling, common-mistakes, verification-protocol) exist as real files exactly one level deep with no nested .md chains, matching the well-signaled anchor-5 structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |