Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, lean operational guide: executable commands, clear lifecycle boundaries, and explicit verification with feedback loops. Progressive disclosure is good with one real reference file, though the bundle is light enough that further file-splitting opportunities are limited.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — no tutorial padding about what TinyBase or reactive state is; every line gives actionable guidance (scaffold commands, lifecycle boundaries, verification steps). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands (`npm create tinybase@latest -- --list-options` and a complete unattended generation invocation) plus concrete inspection targets and named documentation entry points (https://tinybase.org/llms.txt, Context7). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step processes are explicitly sequenced (inspect generator → generate unattended → post-generation checklist → extend → verify) with validation checkpoints including build/type-check, real reload for persistence, two-client sync confirmation, and an explicit feedback note that compilation alone is not proof. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear one-level-deep reference (`references/architecture.md`) is well-signaled for architecture decisions, and the body is appropriately split into scaffold/extend/verify sections; only a single bundled reference exists, leaving minor room for additional navigational pointers (e.g. API reference) rather than a full multi-file structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |