Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, concrete, and well-structured with tool-call-level actionability and validation checkpoints for a destructive operation. The main gap is the absence of an explicit fix-and-re-validate feedback loop after detect_changes_tool, which would lift workflow clarity to the top anchor.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop after step 6: if detect_changes_tool shows impact beyond the plan, revert or adjust and re-run get_impact_radius_tool before re-applying.
Provide one short worked example (e.g. a rename flow) showing the suggest -> preview edit list -> apply -> detect_changes sequence end-to-end.
Trim 'The graph narrows scope; it does not replace the source.' or fold it into the budget line to reach a fully lean conciseness score.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and tool-call driven with little padding; the only mild over-explanation is 'The graph narrows scope; it does not replace the source.', placing it just below the fully lean score-5 anchor at 'efficient with minor trimmable instances'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It specifies concrete tool invocations with modes and parameters (mode="suggest", mode="rename" with old_name/new_name, apply_refactor_tool with refactor_id, detail_level="minimal"), giving mostly executable guidance; it lacks a fully worked example sequence, keeping it just under 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced and include validation checkpoints ('Check the returned edit list before applying' and step 6's detect_changes_tool to confirm impact matches the plan), satisfying the destructive-operation validation rule; the missing explicit fix->re-validate loop keeps it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, short (~25 lines) single-purpose skill with no external references needed; it is organized into clear sections (Steps, Token Efficiency Rules), which per the simple-skills note merits a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |